What do they have in common with each other?
All three have been exposed as men who harm women, along with their histrionic narcissism
and their inability to grasp why their actions are violent.
Exhibit 1: Marcel Aubut: our DJ! blogpost
on complaints lodged against him. For decades people working with Aubut tolerated his preening ego. They were also conveniently indifferent to his sustained sexual harassment of hundreds of athletes, journalists, officials, lawyers, staff members, etc. etc.
After an investigation that unfolded quickly and efficiently, the Canadian Olympic Committee recognized that Aubut created a toxic environment
through his abusive actions, and that its organization was negligent in not addressing the issue judiciously.
Three senior staff were punished
for not handling the Aubut situation correctly. However, the abuser himself has yet to suffer any consequences for his behaviour, nor has he taken responsibility for the harm he did.
Exhibit 2: Sean Penn
Though Penn has been indefatigable in his efforts to establish himself as a saviour
and a serious thinker, most recently as putative writer for Rolling Stone
- he's still the same poseur previously known as a really *bad date*. Like George C. Scott, Penn has physically and mentally abused his partners
. His explosive, violent temper and eggshell ego are epic. But he always gets a pass, because he's a privileged white man with connections and admirers.
One hopes when Charlize Theron abruptly ended their relationship, she made the point that she doesn't suffer violent men gladly
and that he got off relatively lightly, having dropped the mask and ceased to amuse her with his malignant charade.
Exhibit 3: Gregory Alan ElliottThis
summarizes why charges of criminal harassment were filed against him.
Now, let's get a few facts straight: Elliott is not on trial for having a difference of opinion with someone. He is on trial for criminal harassment. He tried repeatedly to contact Guthrie even after she had explicitly asked him to leave them alone. He monitored Guthrie's movements via Twitter, shadowed events she attended, and flooded any hashtag she participated in. He made it clear that he was following her every move by publicly commenting on her tweets, even after she had blocked him. He sent messages to people who interacted with her online, making it clear that he was observing everything she did.Though the judge found the complainants' testimony honest and credible, the bar for proving malice aforethought and deliberate criminal intent was set very high because the women fought back against the bully's campaign of harassment. The tweet below
addresses that perception; click on link to see how GAE supporters aka Men's Rights Activists and crusading gamegaters, responded.
His defence argued *honest* belief with regard to GAE's entitled sense that what he did was not wrong. That bar is set low, as with many sexual assault cases
. Also, GAE's complete pattern of harassment
and incitement to others to do the same, could not be entered into the record.
When he was acquitted
, the judge made it clear the decision did not mean GAE was innocent of wrongdoing as charged. Yet, to borrow the words of Anne Thériault, GAE "mobilized his mob" to attack anyone who wasn't bellowing for his glorious vindication.
A reminder that, like predators Aubut and Penn, it's likely GAE's abusive actions won't be his last. This exposes
what he does: he harasses women and claims that he is the victim.
It's also a chilling warning to women: patriarchy may appear to be in its death-throes, but men who have enjoyed privilege or aspire to it, will do anything to crush those they view as insubordinate or unwilling to meet their demands, and those who have the temerity to challenge them.
As some of us at DJ! painfully learned, this type of malevolence is not limited to a specific political ideology.