Assorted content to end your week.
- Paul Kershaw examines
political parties' child care plans past and present, and finds the NDP's new proposal to achieve better results at a lower cost. The Star's editorial board weighs in
on the desperate need for an improved child care system, while PressProgress focuses
on the economic benefits. Nora Loreto notes
that we should ultimately push for the "universal" aspect of the proposal to mean "free". And Trish Hennessy observes
that there's reason to think a universally-available system will resonate with the Canadian public:
We wondered how parents in Canada would “sell” a universal national child care plan to fellow Canadians. The words came flying fast and loose:
“Accessible to everyone.”
“Good for families.”
“Everyone seems equal.”
“Quebec has it. How come we don’t?”
That was their sales pitch.
Everywhere in Canada, parents engage in a social and financial calculus to determine whether one of them stays home instead of working ‘to pay for daycare’, whether they work opposite shifts so that one parent is always home and to yield cost efficiencies, or whether they wade through a range of possibilities – from having grandma look after the children to placing the child on a child care waiting list immediately upon conception.
Parents displayed a tenacious resourcefulness, often patching together services and supports with limited means to pay for them. It’s like they perform quiet acts of heroism, day in and day out.
In the end, it was the economic argument that proved to be a potent force. They understood affordable child care as a service that would enable parents to work and contribute to the local economy and, in turn, contribute to the tax base – which they understood is how a country pays for a universal program that benefits everyone.- Jim Stanford writes
that a free trade agreement with South Korea deserves to be subject to some serious questioning. And Philip Dorling discusses
a few of the nastiest surprises in the Trans-Pacific Partnership - including the U.S.' demand that all participating countries agree to make reporting on damaging commercial secrets a criminal offence.
- Which is to say that anybody looking to expose, say, the role of corporate greed and neglect in creating gross risks to the public
will have reason to think twice if the business lobby gets its way.
- Of course, the Cons are well ahead of the game on the "stifling speech" aspect of the TPP - as evidenced by the latest CRA crackdown
against Kitchener-Waterloo birdwatchers for daring to write to a public official about the impact of chemicals on bee colonies.
- Meanwhile, Nicholas Hildyard offers up
a presentation on how P3s extract wealth from the public on behalf of elites around the world.
- Finally, Citizens for Public Justice has released
its latest report on poverty in Canada - with a particular focus on groups including recent immigrants, First Nations persons and lone female parents who bear particularly heavy burdens of poverty.