This and that for your Tuesday reading.
- John Abraham and Dana Nuccitelli discuss
the worrisome spread of climate change denialism, particularly around the English-speaking developed world. But lest we accept the theory that declining public knowledge is independent of political choices, Margaret Munro reports
that the Cons are suppressing factual scientific information about Arctic ice levels to avoid the Canadian public being better informed, while Tom Korski exposes
a particularly galling example of their vilifying top scientists for reporting their results. And John O'Connor reminds us
what's been done to anybody who's dared to speak out about the effect of unfettered tar sands development on local residents.
- Jim Bronskill reports
that Transport Canada had been directly warned that safety standard exemptions granted to MMA would put workers and the public at risk in advance of last year's explosion in Lac-Megantic. And Bruce Campbell offers
another study (summarized here
) as to how regulatory failure was behind the disaster.
- Bloomberg reports
that the U.S.' recovery has seen stagnant wages for most workers compared to gains at the top. And Henry Blodget highlights
the even more glaring gap between corporate profits and earned incomes:
There's no "law of capitalism
" that says that companies have to pay their employees as little as possible. There's no law of capitalism that says companies have to "maximize short-term profits
." That's just a story that America's owners made up to justify taking as much of the company's wealth as possible for themselves.
Ironically, this short-term greed on the part of America's owners is likely reducing their long-term wealth: Companies can't grow profits by cutting costs forever, because their profits can't grow higher than their revenues. At some point, revenue growth needs to accelerate. But that won't happen until companies start sharing more of the wealth they create with the folks who create it — their employees.- Michael Butler examines
the readily foreseeable effects of the leaked CETA text in detail - with particular emphasis on its potential damage to Canadian health care.
- Finally, the Ottawa Citizen calls for
a renewed investigation into Robocon in light of Michael Sona's conviction. And Lawrence Martin points out
the most important question left unanswered by the finding that Sona was just one part of a larger scheme to defraud voters:
The term “vote suppression” is a euphemism. When a member or members of a political party run an operation to prevent citizens from voting for another party, it’s tantamount to trying to fix an election result. It’s attempted vote-rigging.
For corrupt political acts, you can’t get much worse. It’s certainly more egregious than abusing housing allowances or misusing government planes, the kinds of allegations that have brought down some prominent politicians lately.
So who else was there? Was the operation carried out with the knowledge or input of any of Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s top lieutenants? Will we ever find out?
Mr. Sona, with whom I have had several conversations, did not testify at his own trial. But he is considering whether to come forward in coming weeks or months with what he knows about the whole sordid business. If it’s true that others were involved, he should name them.